“He smiled the most exquisite
smile, veiled by memory, tinged by dreams.”
To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf is
one of the most well known modernist
books. The novel was written in a stream-of-consciousness
style and it was set in three parts and the plot can be really quickly summed
up with:
The Window: Mrs. and Mr. Ramsay
with their children and guests spending time in their Scottish holiday home.
Six-year-old James wants to go the lighthouse, his mother agrees but Mr. Ramsay
states that the weather is not good enough for the boat journey. One of the
guests, Lily Briscoe is painting. Paul Rayley and Minta Doyle (two guests) get
engaged.
Time Passes: World War 1 breaks
out and the house is left abandoned. Everyone dies... Jokes – it just felt like
that. Mrs. Ramsay died suddenly, Andrew Ramsay (oldest son) dies in battle and
Prue (daughter) dies after giving birth. (Note: the deaths are all told in
brackets)
The Lighthouse:
Mr. Ramsay with his children (those that are still alive) and two of his guests
decide to go back to the house. Mr. Ramsay makes his children go with him to
the Lighthouse. Lily goes back to painting and this time manages to achieve her
vision.
Personally, the summary that I
just gave was exactly what a whole 227 page novel spent describing. But, if you’ve
read my review on Mrs. Dalloway, my lack of enthusiasm for Virginia Woolf
wouldn’t be surprising. For me, I need a plot that I can invest myself in.
However, one thing that I must give to Woolf is her sense of rhythm, like the repetitive and familiar lives of the
Ramsays as the waves come and go in their island. Only when I went back to the
introduction written by Hermione Lee in 1991 (it was included in the version I
borrowed) that I realised how much of a difference her editing and style really
made. Read the manuscript version to see for yourself:
“For nothing/no one [could be more] attracted
her more than this strange old man. His hands were beautiful; & his
[strong] shapely feet. His voice was beautiful, & his words. [He] Above
all, his haste & his fervour; his oddity; his ridiculousness; his burning
extreme/energy; & his remoteness; [& his] But what remained intolerable,
& would forever indicate as with the suddenly raising, unknown to himself,
of an arm, upright, & monitory, & enough to quell the stormiest passions
of her heart, [was] his intolerable [arrogance, his irra] demand upon her, upon
James, upon the whole world perhaps; Submit to me”
And now, the final version;
“For no one attracted her more;
his hands were beautiful to her and his feet, and his voice, and his words, and
his hate, and his temper, and his oddity, and his passion, and his saying
straight out before everyone, we perish, each alone, and his remoteness. (He
had opened his book.) But what remained intolerable, she thought, sitting
upright, and watching Macalister’s boy tug the hook out of the gills of another
fish, was that crass blindness and tyranny of his which has poisoned her
childhood and raised bitter storms, so that even now she woke in the night
trembling with rage and remembered some command of his; some insolence; ‘Do
this’, ‘Do that’; his dominance: his ‘Submit to me’.”
A note to future readers of the
book – don’t over read it!! As a student of English, as soon as I reached the
topic of the light house I instantly thought of some symbolic meaning, that the
lighthouse stood for something, some longing or repression. But the lighthouse
itself is not a code word for anything it is really just a way to connect all three parts and to provide a
time for characters to reflect on their own emotions as they wonder about the
lighthouse. Even Woolf actually said,
“I meant nothing by The
Lighthouse. One has to have a central line down the middle of the book to hold
the design together. I saw that all sorts of feelings would accrue to this, but
I refused to think them out, and trusted that people would make it the deposit
for their own emotions – which they have done, one thinking it means one thing
another. I can’t manage Symbolism except in this vague, generalized way.”
Since Woolf doesn't concentrate in
the use of symbols and motifs in To the Lighthouse, a simple reading can
give the reader both pleasure (if you enjoy modernist books) and an
understanding of what was in Woolf’s mind – life, death (always looming) and
family. In truth, the book was almost a therapy
for Woolf’s own problems and memories of her childhood and her parents. It
was a way for Woolf to get out all of thoughts on her family into a book and
this was the main idea of the story. There was no real complex plot but it was
an analysis of family life and dealing
with grief/loss. It analysed the familiar routines and how we try to repeat the
routine even when things change and we grow, but nothing can happen twice; there
were two dinners, a promised and a real journey to the lighthouse and two
paintings and none of them were as good as the first time, especially coming
back to the house without Mrs Ramsay.
No comments:
Post a Comment