“...[A]nything worth dying
for ... is certainly worth living for.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72975/72975c35bfec5ef1997071e47a5978866437b1b9" alt=""
Heller’s satirical book is,
despite initial controversy, a defining novel of the 20th Century.
Despite it being set during WWII, the book concerns postmodernist ideas. The
book is still taught in schools and contains important critiques that can still
be applied to modern society. Any reader has to be prepared to face the absurdity
of Heller’s work. Personally, I did not enjoy the book. However, this is
because I prefer the structure and predictability of Victorian literature. But
I am glad that I read this book. I thought Heller presented very important
ideas and I agreed with many of his values; some of these ideas will be
explored later in this review.
The novel has become
representative of postmodernist literature by its subversion of form to
represent the zeitgeist of the time. The book uses an ‘anti-novel’ structure
and an ‘anti-hero’. The book rejects many of the traditional novel formats. The
book is not written in chronological order and does not follow the structure of
introduction, climax and conclusion. Instead the reader is introduced to
Yossarian in a hospital talking about events that will only occur at the end of
the book. Yossarian talks about the death of Snowden during a mission that isn’t
described until the second last chapter of the book. The novel also has an
ambiguous ending, living questions unanswered. Yossarian, the protagonist, is
not a ‘hero’. Yossarian has many faults and is quite insane – or at actually he
is quite sane in an insane world. Yossarian does not have the courage and
intengrity that heroes often display. The whole plot follows Yossarian’s plan
to escape, including the lies he creates to stay in a hospital where he can
escape his duties. These are two of the main ways that Heller changes the
format of books in order to represent the new values of the postmodern world.
Themes