“One believes things because one
has been conditioned to believe them.”
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
reminds me of a more disturbing and extreme version of 1984. The 20th
Century novel is set in London in 2540 (in the book, known as 632 after Ford). The world is stable; nobody ever suffers, the
world is united, the people are happy and everyone is in a job that is
satisfactory to them. However, this means controlling everything; the world has
a stable population of 2 billion, children are ‘manufactured’ in labs,
genetically modified to fit a caste and then educated – almost traumatized/terrorized
– to fit into society. The lower castes (the majority of the population) are bred
through a process in which one single egg produces up to 96 identical children.
When Bernard and Lenina travel to the “Savage Reservation”, they are shocked at
the difference between the two worlds. They end up encountering, John, a young
man that was born from World State parents but born and raised in the Savage
World. John is an outsider due to his appearance in the primitive village, and
finds comfort in reading Shakespeare. Bernard decides to take John and his
mother back to London. However, John finds the ‘civilized’ society appalling
and is still feels as the outsider...
I do enjoy science-fiction novels,
especially dystopian fiction, and I was quite enthralled by the book from the
beginning. However, personally, this is one of the hardest books to classify it
as good or bad, or if I liked it or disliked it. Like mentioned before, this is
a much more disturbing version of 1984; it’s a very shocking book. This makes
readers see the book as the savage would and gets Huxley’s ideas across; however,
it sometimes a bit unsettling to read. The other reason why I don’t feel
confident in declaring an interest is because the book does not present a
possible answer to any problems stressed in this book. The savage’s world is
too primitive and it values self-inflicted punishments as a way to repent. And
on the other hand, the modern world offers no real pleasure, emotions or choice
in life. It is like Huxley wrote in his 1946 foreword, “If I were now to
rewrite the book, I would offer the Savage a third alternative. Between
the utopian and the primitive horns of his dilemma would lie the possibility of
sanity. . .” Not all books are to serve as answer, like Huxley, some
books pose questions and problems. However, I always feel the need for a
conclusion to a story, and it would help if Huxley had offered John sanity, if
John had managed to learn, find a balance and start a revolution or a small
sane town, or even if Huxley had just shown to the readers, the community of
refugees in exile from the New World.
Brave New World shows the possible
problems that could arise from a materialistic world run by money-hungry
governments in a society that conditions people to conform. In order for the society
and the economy to be stable, people must seek to consume as many goods and
services as possible. This leaves a person with no room to be creative or
inventive. It also means that everyone is employed. However, along the way,
workers must be exploited so that others can buy the products and the exploited
workers can keep their job. The answer that the New World found to this is the genetically
modified caste system. Also, people are taught from the day they are born the
values of the society. Because they are conditioned from a young age, it is
rare from the population to stray from them, and it would be nearly impossible
to change their views. This allows the community to remain stable as everyone
believes in the same key values. However, this limits freedom as people are
told what they can and can’t do. In some ways this can be seen in our world, as
society always imposes unwritten laws, and anyone who strays is often
ostracized. Through this book it is clear to see that it is hard to change someone’s
beliefs as people take on some irrational values just because they were raised
with them. This is why it the road to marriage, racial and gender equality is a
long one and why the younger generation, growing up in a more open society, is
often more accepting of differences.
It is completely abhorrent to
think of this fictional society as a possible futuristic society. However, if
it ever did happen, I do think that the population would be just as ignorant as
the characters in Brave New World. It is sad the workers are being exploited
but are conditioned to be happy within their position in the societal hierarchy
and not to ever be ambitious or want to improve their living conditions. I do
think that in some cases this is already true, as some of the poorest people in
developing nations would be very happy just to get paid or to get a job, even
if they are being taken advantage of by rich multi-national companies. Of
course, I would like to hope that they have ambitions, however, for some, it is
almost impossible to break the poverty cycle. Even in the developed nations,
how can we ever be sure that one way is the correct way, that our governments are
really striving for the best for the population or that our choices are ever
our own? Just like all the characters in Brave New World, we could be living in
ignorance. This is quite a pessimistic point of view and I do not think it is
true for many people. However, it is important to always be researching and
questioning things.
Brave New World, in my mind, is a
controversial book. In some aspects it’s very interesting and very short. But
in other respects, this book is disconcerting and has to be approached with a
very open mind. I did enjoy reading it, but I don’t think it’s a book that I’d
ever read again. It’s definitely been listed as one of the top books of the 20th
Century by many magazines and critics, but it’s not for everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment